http://townhall.com/tipsheet/MichaelMedved/2010/12/21/yale,_harvard_and_the_leadership_clique
Conservative talk show host Michael Medved notes that every elected president of the past two decades has graduated from either Yale or Harvard, with George W Bush graduating from both. Ten of the twelve nominees of either party and all nine sitting Supreme Court justices hold Yale or Harvard degrees.
When Harvard and Yale were among the only major universities, they only claimed 3 of the first 25 presidents. Since 1900, it was 9 or about half of presidents.
Wednesday, December 22, 2010
Monday, December 20, 2010
Significant economic returns to attending an elite private institutions
Here's what the New York Times had to say about whether or not you'll make money by going to an elite private institutions. Most of the studies say ... definitely yes. If you correct for the talent of the student, comparable students in cheaper schools did about as well, but low income students (and perhaps affirmative action preferential admits?) do make more even accounting for ability. What this study does NOT look at is the fact that unless you make over $250,000, the most elite schools have the most financial aid, so it' misleading to look at "sticker" prices. A couple of elite private schools my kids are looked at offered a price comparable to the big state school after financial aid and loans were taken into account.
Is Going to an Elite College Worth the Cost?By JACQUES STEINBERG
Published: December 17, 2010
Among the most cited research on the subject — a paper by economists from the RAND Corporation and Brigham Young and Cornell Universities — found that “strong evidence emerges of a significant economic return to attending an elite private institution, and some evidence suggests this premium has increased over time.”
Grouping colleges by the same tiers of selectivity used in a popular college guidebook, Barron’s, the researchers found that alumni of the most selective colleges earned, on average, 40 percent more a year than those who graduated from the least selective public universities, as calculated 10 years after they graduated from high school.
Those same researchers found in a separate paper that “attendance at an elite private college significantly increases the probability of attending graduate school, and more specifically graduate school at a major research university.”
Eric R. Eide, one of the authors of that paper on the earnings of blue-chip college graduates, said he had seen no evidence that would persuade him to revise, in 2010, the conclusion he reached in 1998.
“Education is a long-run investment,” said Professor Eide, chairman of the economics department at Brigham Young, “It may be more painful to finance right now. People may be more hesitant to go into debt because of the recession. In my opinion, they should be looking over the long run of their child’s life.” .... He added, “I don’t think the costs of college are going up faster than the returns on graduating from an elite private college.”
... earnings of studnets [matched for ability] was about the same but .....
(The one exception was that children from “disadvantaged family backgrounds” appeared to earn more over time if they attended more selective colleges. The authors, Stacy Berg Dale and Alan B. Krueger, do not speculate why, but conclude, “These students appear to benefit most from attending a more elite college.”)
Is Going to an Elite College Worth the Cost?By JACQUES STEINBERG
Published: December 17, 2010
Among the most cited research on the subject — a paper by economists from the RAND Corporation and Brigham Young and Cornell Universities — found that “strong evidence emerges of a significant economic return to attending an elite private institution, and some evidence suggests this premium has increased over time.”
Grouping colleges by the same tiers of selectivity used in a popular college guidebook, Barron’s, the researchers found that alumni of the most selective colleges earned, on average, 40 percent more a year than those who graduated from the least selective public universities, as calculated 10 years after they graduated from high school.
Those same researchers found in a separate paper that “attendance at an elite private college significantly increases the probability of attending graduate school, and more specifically graduate school at a major research university.”
Eric R. Eide, one of the authors of that paper on the earnings of blue-chip college graduates, said he had seen no evidence that would persuade him to revise, in 2010, the conclusion he reached in 1998.
“Education is a long-run investment,” said Professor Eide, chairman of the economics department at Brigham Young, “It may be more painful to finance right now. People may be more hesitant to go into debt because of the recession. In my opinion, they should be looking over the long run of their child’s life.” .... He added, “I don’t think the costs of college are going up faster than the returns on graduating from an elite private college.”
... earnings of studnets [matched for ability] was about the same but .....
(The one exception was that children from “disadvantaged family backgrounds” appeared to earn more over time if they attended more selective colleges. The authors, Stacy Berg Dale and Alan B. Krueger, do not speculate why, but conclude, “These students appear to benefit most from attending a more elite college.”)
Thursday, October 28, 2010
TOO MANY LAWYERS PRODUCED BY LAW SCHOOLS
Full article: http://www.slate.com/id/2272621/pagenum/all/#p2
Law schools are manufacturing more lawyers than America needs, and law students aren't happy about it. By Annie Lowrey Posted Wednesday, Oct. 27, 2010, at 4:14 PM ET
Law schools are manufacturing more lawyers than America needs, and law students aren't happy about it. By Annie Lowrey Posted Wednesday, Oct. 27, 2010, at 4:14 PM ET
Excerpt: Between 2007 and 2009, the number of LSAT takers climbed 20.5 percent. Law school applications increased in turn... But now a number of recent or current law students are saying—or screaming—that they made a mistake. They went to law school, they say, and now they're underemployed or jobless, in debt, and three years older. And statistics show that the evidence is more than anecdotal.... One popular medium is the "scam blog," where indebted, unemployed attorneys accuse law schools of being little better than tuition-sucking diploma mills. (Sample blog title: Shilling Me Softly.) The author of one popular, if histrionic, such blog describes his law school as a Ponzi scheme.
Friday, October 22, 2010
U Wash and OSU: Cheap Public State Unversity Vs Posh Private
Before you give up on posh private schools like Villanova, Santa Clara University, Worcester Polytechnic, Seattle University or Stevens Institute of Technology, some of these schools (I won't say exactly who or how much) charge about the same or not much more than in-state residents with dorms, even if you make far above a working class income. (we're talking $15-25,000/ yr) You never know until you get an offer back. Some of the schools were more generous than what the federal "FAFSA" says they think you should pay. If you feel like sharing what YOUR kid got as an offer, go ahead and leave comments.
The very top schools like Harvard, Stanford, Princeton or MIT will give you a free ride if your parents pull in $60-$70,000 or less, which is what a top engineering graduate might expect to make with a stay-at-home mom after a few years. Or they will charge a percentage up to 10 percent up to $100,000. The trick is getting in when these schools have lottery odds with less than 10 percent of students admitted. But the second-strings schools mentioned above have 45-70 percent admit rates and offer basically similar programs and quality for a less valued nameplate, and it seems they offer a viable alternative for not much more or close to what a state university would cost if you plan to live on campus.
The financial aid flier from Oregon State University in Corvallis OR (we live near Seattle) is about the same deal as what we're paying for a great private university with financial aid,. I know some parents that make much more than us who aren't paying too much more than that for similar 2nd tier schools like Stevens Institute of Technology. Lesson - don't automatically assume the state university for a resident will always be much cheaper than a big sticker-price private university.
Estimated costs 2010-2011:
Oregon resident tuition: $7,218 (not so bad)
Nonresident $20,442
Other expenses $13,505 (room board and everything else)
total resident: $20,723
nonresident $33.947
The University of Washington in Seattle is similar, $22,000 with dorm, $15,000 for commuter (but parents still need to pay for car, insurance, bus pass, food etc) $45,000 full price isn't much different that posh private schools (but Univerity of Washington is more famous than a bunch of posh private schools with higher test scores but without awesome football teams)
2010-2011 Student Budget Nine-Month Living Expenses
Budget Items
Lives with Parents Undergrad Traditional Undergrad Non-Traditional Undergrad
Books $1,035 $1,035 $1,035
Room/Board $3,189 $9,399 $13,578
Personal $2,265 $2,265 $2,265
Transportation $642 $642 $1,524
Resident Tuition $8,701 $8,701 $8,701
Resident Total Costs $15,832 $22,042 $27,103
Non-Resident Tuition $25,329 $25,329 $25,329
Non-Resident Total Costs $32,460 $38,670 $43,731
Non-Traditional: Undergraduates who have children; married undergraduates whose spouses are not also enrolled.
The very top schools like Harvard, Stanford, Princeton or MIT will give you a free ride if your parents pull in $60-$70,000 or less, which is what a top engineering graduate might expect to make with a stay-at-home mom after a few years. Or they will charge a percentage up to 10 percent up to $100,000. The trick is getting in when these schools have lottery odds with less than 10 percent of students admitted. But the second-strings schools mentioned above have 45-70 percent admit rates and offer basically similar programs and quality for a less valued nameplate, and it seems they offer a viable alternative for not much more or close to what a state university would cost if you plan to live on campus.
The financial aid flier from Oregon State University in Corvallis OR (we live near Seattle) is about the same deal as what we're paying for a great private university with financial aid,. I know some parents that make much more than us who aren't paying too much more than that for similar 2nd tier schools like Stevens Institute of Technology. Lesson - don't automatically assume the state university for a resident will always be much cheaper than a big sticker-price private university.
Estimated costs 2010-2011:
Oregon resident tuition: $7,218 (not so bad)
Nonresident $20,442
Other expenses $13,505 (room board and everything else)
total resident: $20,723
nonresident $33.947
The University of Washington in Seattle is similar, $22,000 with dorm, $15,000 for commuter (but parents still need to pay for car, insurance, bus pass, food etc) $45,000 full price isn't much different that posh private schools (but Univerity of Washington is more famous than a bunch of posh private schools with higher test scores but without awesome football teams)
2010-2011 Student Budget Nine-Month Living Expenses
Budget Items
Lives with Parents Undergrad Traditional Undergrad Non-Traditional Undergrad
Books $1,035 $1,035 $1,035
Room/Board $3,189 $9,399 $13,578
Personal $2,265 $2,265 $2,265
Transportation $642 $642 $1,524
Resident Tuition $8,701 $8,701 $8,701
Resident Total Costs $15,832 $22,042 $27,103
Non-Resident Tuition $25,329 $25,329 $25,329
Non-Resident Total Costs $32,460 $38,670 $43,731
Non-Traditional: Undergraduates who have children; married undergraduates whose spouses are not also enrolled.
Tuesday, October 12, 2010
Princeton Shows Typical Financial Aid 2010
from http://www.princeton.edu/main/news/archive/S28/50/00O59/index.xml?section=topstories
Here's a table of what different income levels will get IF they can get into Princeton, followed by article on how they've decided to expand the size of incoming classes, and move to a no-loan system. If your family makes $60,000 (about what a graduate of Princeton engineering school might make, or maybe two liberal arts grads of an average college might start out with) you will get in for essentially free. Even if you pull in $200,000, if you have two kids going to college, you'll still get a discount the size of a new Honda civic.
===================================================
The University’s comprehensive financial aid plan helps moderate-, middle- and upper-middle-income families afford the cost of a Princeton education. The figures below show the average grant, by yearly income, for students at various family income levels in the freshman class of 2014.
Tuition, room and board is $48,580 for 2010-11.
Yearly income:
Up to $60,000
Average grant: $48,600
What it covers: Full tuition, room and board, and some expenses
Yearly income:
$60,000 to $80,000
Average grant: $45,100
What it covers: Full tuition, 71 percent of room and board
Yearly income:
$80,000 to $100,000
Average grant: $42,250
What it covers: Full tuition, 47 percent of room and board
Yearly income:
$100,000 to $120,000
Average grant: $38,750
What it covers: Full tuition, 18 percent of room and board
Yearly income:
$120,000 to $140,000
Average grant: $34,700
What it covers: 95 percent of tuition
Yearly income:
$140,000 to $160,000
Average grant: $30,400
What it covers: 83 percent of tuition
Yearly income:
$160,000 to $180,000
Average grant: $26,450
What it covers: 72 percent of tuition
Yearly income:
$180,000 to $200,000
Average grant: $22,700
What it covers: 62 percent of tuition
Yearly income:
$200,000 and above*
Average grant: $17,000
What it covers: 46 percent of tuition
*Most who qualify at this income level have two children in college.
Source: Office of Financial Aid
Freshman class reflects commitment to access and affordability
Posted September 20, 2010; 06:00 p.m. share
e-mail
printby Karin DienstThe Princeton class of 2014, selected from a record number of applicants, reflects continued success in the University's efforts to attract a diverse student body and to make a Princeton education affordable to all students who enroll.
"At Princeton, access and affordability are core values, and we are extraordinarily fortunate to be able to hold firm to our commitment to the strongest possible undergraduate financial aid program in a period of significant fiscal stringency," Dean of the College Nancy Malkiel said in her report on class of 2014 admissions at the Sept. 20 faculty meeting. "As the data ... make plain, we continue to be tremendously successful in attaining our goal of making Princeton affordable for any student regardless of family financial circumstances."
The class of 2014 is Princeton’s largest, in keeping with a planned gradual expansion of the size of the undergraduate student body as the University moves toward reaching its "steady state" of enrolling 5,200 students by the 2012-13 academic year. The incoming 1,313 freshmen were selected from a record 26,247 applicants. The number of applicants increased 19.5 percent from the previous record of 21,963 for the class of 2013. Overall, Princeton offered admission to 2,311 applicants, or 8.8 percent -- the lowest ever -- of those who applied to the class of 2014. This compares to 10.1 percent in 2009-10.
The 11 percent expansion of the undergraduate student body began in 2005; 2014 is the second class to have reached the new norm of roughly 1,300 entering students.
This year, 768 freshmen, or 58 percent of the class, are receiving financial aid, with a total of $27 million in scholarships. The average grant is $35,157. The incoming class includes 208 students from low-income backgrounds, or nearly 16 percent of freshmen.
The class of 2014 is the 13th to matriculate since the University initiated significant policy changes in undergraduate financial aid -- including a pioneering "no-loan" policy -- to make a Princeton education more affordable to a broader range of students. In the class of 2001, the last class to enter before the aid improvements, 38 percent of the students were on financial aid with an average grant of $15,064, and students from low-income backgrounds made up 8 percent of the class.
The class of 2014 includes the largest number of students from minority backgrounds in Princeton’s history, with a total of 490 students from American minorities representing 37.3 percent of the class.
The class of 2014 also includes 141 international students, constituting 10.7 percent of the class. The international students represent 47 countries.
The class of 2014 is the third freshman class to be evenly balanced in terms of gender.
The figures for the incoming freshman class do not include the 20 students admitted to the class of 2014 who are participating in the second year of Princeton’s Bridge Year Program, in which they spend a year abroad on service projects. Those students will enroll with the class of 2015. The figures for the class of 2014 do include the 20 students admitted with the class of 2013 who participated in the Bridge Year Program in 2009-10.
According to the Office of the Registrar, Princeton currently enrolls 5,103 undergraduates. (Official opening enrollment numbers will be available in October.)
Here's a table of what different income levels will get IF they can get into Princeton, followed by article on how they've decided to expand the size of incoming classes, and move to a no-loan system. If your family makes $60,000 (about what a graduate of Princeton engineering school might make, or maybe two liberal arts grads of an average college might start out with) you will get in for essentially free. Even if you pull in $200,000, if you have two kids going to college, you'll still get a discount the size of a new Honda civic.
===================================================
The University’s comprehensive financial aid plan helps moderate-, middle- and upper-middle-income families afford the cost of a Princeton education. The figures below show the average grant, by yearly income, for students at various family income levels in the freshman class of 2014.
Tuition, room and board is $48,580 for 2010-11.
Yearly income:
Up to $60,000
Average grant: $48,600
What it covers: Full tuition, room and board, and some expenses
Yearly income:
$60,000 to $80,000
Average grant: $45,100
What it covers: Full tuition, 71 percent of room and board
Yearly income:
$80,000 to $100,000
Average grant: $42,250
What it covers: Full tuition, 47 percent of room and board
Yearly income:
$100,000 to $120,000
Average grant: $38,750
What it covers: Full tuition, 18 percent of room and board
Yearly income:
$120,000 to $140,000
Average grant: $34,700
What it covers: 95 percent of tuition
Yearly income:
$140,000 to $160,000
Average grant: $30,400
What it covers: 83 percent of tuition
Yearly income:
$160,000 to $180,000
Average grant: $26,450
What it covers: 72 percent of tuition
Yearly income:
$180,000 to $200,000
Average grant: $22,700
What it covers: 62 percent of tuition
Yearly income:
$200,000 and above*
Average grant: $17,000
What it covers: 46 percent of tuition
*Most who qualify at this income level have two children in college.
Source: Office of Financial Aid
Freshman class reflects commitment to access and affordability
Posted September 20, 2010; 06:00 p.m. share
printby Karin DienstThe Princeton class of 2014, selected from a record number of applicants, reflects continued success in the University's efforts to attract a diverse student body and to make a Princeton education affordable to all students who enroll.
"At Princeton, access and affordability are core values, and we are extraordinarily fortunate to be able to hold firm to our commitment to the strongest possible undergraduate financial aid program in a period of significant fiscal stringency," Dean of the College Nancy Malkiel said in her report on class of 2014 admissions at the Sept. 20 faculty meeting. "As the data ... make plain, we continue to be tremendously successful in attaining our goal of making Princeton affordable for any student regardless of family financial circumstances."
The class of 2014 is Princeton’s largest, in keeping with a planned gradual expansion of the size of the undergraduate student body as the University moves toward reaching its "steady state" of enrolling 5,200 students by the 2012-13 academic year. The incoming 1,313 freshmen were selected from a record 26,247 applicants. The number of applicants increased 19.5 percent from the previous record of 21,963 for the class of 2013. Overall, Princeton offered admission to 2,311 applicants, or 8.8 percent -- the lowest ever -- of those who applied to the class of 2014. This compares to 10.1 percent in 2009-10.
The 11 percent expansion of the undergraduate student body began in 2005; 2014 is the second class to have reached the new norm of roughly 1,300 entering students.
This year, 768 freshmen, or 58 percent of the class, are receiving financial aid, with a total of $27 million in scholarships. The average grant is $35,157. The incoming class includes 208 students from low-income backgrounds, or nearly 16 percent of freshmen.
The class of 2014 is the 13th to matriculate since the University initiated significant policy changes in undergraduate financial aid -- including a pioneering "no-loan" policy -- to make a Princeton education more affordable to a broader range of students. In the class of 2001, the last class to enter before the aid improvements, 38 percent of the students were on financial aid with an average grant of $15,064, and students from low-income backgrounds made up 8 percent of the class.
The class of 2014 includes the largest number of students from minority backgrounds in Princeton’s history, with a total of 490 students from American minorities representing 37.3 percent of the class.
The class of 2014 also includes 141 international students, constituting 10.7 percent of the class. The international students represent 47 countries.
The class of 2014 is the third freshman class to be evenly balanced in terms of gender.
The figures for the incoming freshman class do not include the 20 students admitted to the class of 2014 who are participating in the second year of Princeton’s Bridge Year Program, in which they spend a year abroad on service projects. Those students will enroll with the class of 2015. The figures for the class of 2014 do include the 20 students admitted with the class of 2013 who participated in the Bridge Year Program in 2009-10.
According to the Office of the Registrar, Princeton currently enrolls 5,103 undergraduates. (Official opening enrollment numbers will be available in October.)
Sunday, October 10, 2010
Don't you hate looking up mailing addresses?
The problem with sending in recommendations by mail is that you have to look up the mailing address, but it's always a different place on each website, and sometimes it's not even on the website.
So here are some of the college addresses I had to look up:
Office of Admissions and Financial Aid
Harvard College
86 Brattle Street
Cambridge, MA 02138
Boston University Admissions
121 Bay State Road
Boston, MA 02215
Tufts University
Office of Undergraduate Admissions
Bendetson Hall
Medford, MA 02155
Santa Clara University
Admissions office
500 El Camino Real
Santa Clara 95053
Stanford University
Office of Undergraduate Admission.
Montag Hall,
355 Galvez Street
Stanford, California 94305-6106
Office of Admissions
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Room 3-108
77 Massachusetts Ave.
Cambridge, MA 02139-4307
617-253-3400
So here are some of the college addresses I had to look up:
Office of Admissions and Financial Aid
Harvard College
86 Brattle Street
Cambridge, MA 02138
Boston University Admissions
121 Bay State Road
Boston, MA 02215
Tufts University
Office of Undergraduate Admissions
Bendetson Hall
Medford, MA 02155
Santa Clara University
Admissions office
500 El Camino Real
Santa Clara 95053
Stanford University
Office of Undergraduate Admission.
Montag Hall,
355 Galvez Street
Stanford, California 94305-6106
Office of Admissions
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Room 3-108
77 Massachusetts Ave.
Cambridge, MA 02139-4307
617-253-3400
Monday, September 13, 2010
Payscale's Colleges Worth the Investment
Investor's Business Daily highlighted Payscale's "Colleges With Top Investment Return" in their August 6, 2010 issue at http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article/542942/201008061829/Colleges-With-Top-Investment-Return-.aspx (requires sign-in) MIT leads the lifetime earnings, but Harvey Mudd College (which it turns out these days is nearly as hard to get into) leads median midcareer pay.
"Check PayScale's list of cumulative dollars earned in 30 years of work. Leading the way is MIT with $1.7 million (or 56,000 per year, but not clear if that's 1980 dollars or now) Close behind is Caltech with $1.6 million in total earnings"
"... midcareer median pay leaders. Harvey Mudd College — with median midcareer pay of $126,000 — edges out Princeton, Harvard and Dartmouth. The Claremont, Calif., school also tops Caltech, MIT and Stanford."
PayScale.com is one place that automates the process for you. The site collects college-cost and post-college pay data. It calculates return on investment for people who get just an undergraduate degree at 555 colleges.
.... You'll also see names that are obscure to most people outside the home turf, such as the Colorado School of Mines.
Each Ivy-topper's annual return on investment beats 13%.
Harvard, 20th on the list, has an ROI of 12.5%.
Low costs can be key. ROI at the University of Florida, for one, is 13% for in-state residents.
Once they graduate, Gators with just a bachelor's degree can expect to earn $696,700 within 30 years, which averages out to $23,223 a year.
That pales next to Harvard grads' $1.6 million, or $50,000 a year.
But as a state school, a Florida undergraduate degree typically costs $70,150. A Harvard sheepskin runs nearly $190,000...
Other quantitative-oriented degrees — applied math, physics, economics — round out the top 10.
To be sure, compared with graduates of less-prestigious colleges, grads of the best-known research universities tend to earn more early in their careers and by midcareer. The differences can be big.
"But the pay gaps between top- and lowest-earning majors are generally even bigger," Lee said. "So what you major in makes more difference than where you go."
And here's the payscale web page for the top 100, see
http://www.payscale.com/education/average-cost-for-college-ROI for the complete list.
Among some of the colleges we were looking at:
1 MIT
2 CalTech
3 Harvard
4 Harvey Mudd
6 Stanford
15 Worcester Polytechnic
30 Stevens Institute
33 Santa Clara University
47 UCLA
48 USC
53 Vanderbilt University
Top 100
Colleges Worth Your Investment - Full List
"Check PayScale's list of cumulative dollars earned in 30 years of work. Leading the way is MIT with $1.7 million (or 56,000 per year, but not clear if that's 1980 dollars or now) Close behind is Caltech with $1.6 million in total earnings"
"... midcareer median pay leaders. Harvey Mudd College — with median midcareer pay of $126,000 — edges out Princeton, Harvard and Dartmouth. The Claremont, Calif., school also tops Caltech, MIT and Stanford."
PayScale.com is one place that automates the process for you. The site collects college-cost and post-college pay data. It calculates return on investment for people who get just an undergraduate degree at 555 colleges.
.... You'll also see names that are obscure to most people outside the home turf, such as the Colorado School of Mines.
Each Ivy-topper's annual return on investment beats 13%.
Harvard, 20th on the list, has an ROI of 12.5%.
Low costs can be key. ROI at the University of Florida, for one, is 13% for in-state residents.
Once they graduate, Gators with just a bachelor's degree can expect to earn $696,700 within 30 years, which averages out to $23,223 a year.
That pales next to Harvard grads' $1.6 million, or $50,000 a year.
But as a state school, a Florida undergraduate degree typically costs $70,150. A Harvard sheepskin runs nearly $190,000...
Other quantitative-oriented degrees — applied math, physics, economics — round out the top 10.
To be sure, compared with graduates of less-prestigious colleges, grads of the best-known research universities tend to earn more early in their careers and by midcareer. The differences can be big.
"But the pay gaps between top- and lowest-earning majors are generally even bigger," Lee said. "So what you major in makes more difference than where you go."
And here's the payscale web page for the top 100, see
http://www.payscale.com/education/average-cost-for-college-ROI for the complete list.
Among some of the colleges we were looking at:
1 MIT
2 CalTech
3 Harvard
4 Harvey Mudd
6 Stanford
15 Worcester Polytechnic
30 Stevens Institute
33 Santa Clara University
47 UCLA
48 USC
53 Vanderbilt University
Top 100
Colleges Worth Your Investment - Full List
Loading... | |||||
1 | Private | $189,300 | $1,688,000 | 12.6% | |
2 | Private | $181,100 | $1,644,000 | 12.6% | |
3 | Private | $189,600 | $1,631,000 | 12.5% | |
4 | Private | $187,700 | $1,627,000 | 12.5% | |
5 | Private | $188,400 | $1,587,000 | 12.4% | |
6 | Private | $191,800 | $1,565,000 | 12.3% | |
7 | Private | $187,700 | $1,517,000 | 12.3% | |
8 | Private | $194,200 | $1,392,000 | 11.9% | |
9 | Private | $181,900 | $1,384,000 | 12.1% | |
10 | Private | $191,300 | $1,361,000 | 11.8% | |
11 | Private | $187,600 | $1,319,000 | 11.8% | |
12 | Private | $180,400 | $1,308,000 | 11.9% | |
13 | Private | $186,500 | $1,262,000 | 11.7% | |
14 | Private | $188,200 | $1,259,000 | 11.6% | |
15 | Private | $184,900 | $1,224,000 | 11.6% | |
16 | Public (In-State) | $118,900 | $1,223,000 | 13.1% | |
17 | Private | $190,600 | $1,220,000 | 11.5% | |
18 | Private | $187,700 | $1,167,000 | 11.4% | |
19 | Private | $192,200 | $1,161,000 | 11.3% | |
20 | Private | $227,300 | $1,158,000 | 10.8% | |
21 | Private | $199,800 | $1,147,000 | 11.2% | |
22 | Private | $188,500 | $1,146,000 | 11.3% | |
23 | Public (Out-of-State) | $212,200 | $1,139,000 | 10.9% | |
24 | Private | $189,800 | $1,138,000 | 11.3% | |
25 | Private | $183,700 | $1,137,000 | 11.4% | |
26 | Private | $159,400 | $1,132,000 | 11.8% | |
27 | Public (In-State) | $95,740 | $1,132,000 | 13.6% | |
28 | Private | $188,200 | $1,132,000 | 11.3% | |
29 | Private | $179,500 | $1,129,000 | 11.4% | |
30 | Private | $222,600 | $1,111,000 | 10.7% | |
31 | Public (In-State) | $79,140 | $1,111,000 | 14.2% | |
32 | Public (Out-of-State) | $160,700 | $1,088,000 | 11.7% | |
33 | Private | $187,500 | $1,072,000 | 11.1% | |
34 | Private | $182,600 | $1,069,000 | 11.2% | |
35 | Private | $195,800 | $1,055,000 | 11% | |
36 | Public (Out-of-State) | $157,600 | $1,050,000 | 11.6% | |
37 | Private | $137,100 | $1,038,000 | 12% | |
38 | Public (In-State) | $74,410 | $1,038,000 | 14.1% | |
39 | Private | $183,200 | $1,017,000 | 11% | |
40 | Private | $166,700 | $1,016,000 | 11.3% | |
41 | Private | $191,300 | $1,012,000 | 10.9% | |
42 | Private | $177,700 | $1,008,000 | 11.1% | |
43 | Private | $184,600 | $1,001,000 | 11% | |
44 | Private | $190,100 | $998,800 | 10.9% | |
45 | Public (Out-of-State) | $149,000 | $968,400 | 11.5% | |
46 | Public (In-State) | $106,600 | $966,900 | 12.6% | |
47 | Public (In-State) | $94,100 | $961,200 | 13.1% | |
48 | Private | $193,000 | $950,400 | 10.7% | |
49 | Private | $189,100 | $927,600 | 10.7% | |
50 | Private | $188,200 | $904,100 | 10.6% | |
51 | Public (In-State) | $74,720 | $895,000 | 13.6% | |
52 | Public (Out-of-State) | $170,100 | $893,600 | 10.9% | |
53 | Private | $193,200 | $892,700 | 10.5% | |
54 | Private | $194,200 | $891,000 | 10.5% | |
55 | Public (In-State) | $106,500 | $888,200 | 12.4% | |
56 | Public (Out-of-State) | $200,300 | $887,300 | 10.4% | |
57 | Private | $188,300 | $880,500 | 10.5% | |
58 | Public (In-State) | $84,690 | $875,400 | 13.1% | |
59 | Private | $182,600 | $875,200 | 10.6% | |
60 | Private | $190,800 | $861,200 | 10.4% | |
61 | Private | $214,400 | $859,300 | 10.1% | |
62 | Public (In-State) | $83,270 | $854,300 | 13.1% | |
63 | Private | $183,900 | $846,200 | 10.5% | |
64 | Public (In-State) | $86,440 | $844,000 | 12.9% | |
65 | Private | $188,100 | $842,000 | 10.4% | |
66 | Private | $194,400 | $841,100 | 10.3% | |
67 | Public (Out-of-State) | $143,500 | $832,400 | 11.2% | |
68 | Public (Out-of-State) | $175,400 | $831,600 | 10.6% | |
69 | Private | $176,800 | $830,000 | 10.5% | |
70 | Private | $175,900 | $823,200 | 10.5% | |
71 | Public (In-State) | $88,540 | $816,000 | 12.7% | |
72 | Public (In-State) | $114,400 | $813,900 | 11.8% | |
73 | Public (Out-of-State) | $137,300 | $808,900 | 11.2% | |
74 | Public (Out-of-State) | $142,600 | $808,000 | 11.1% | |
75 | Public (Out-of-State) | $165,400 | $804,400 | 10.6% | |
76 | Private | $206,100 | $801,900 | 10% | |
77 | Private | $58,450 | $797,000 | 14.1% | |
78 | Private | $184,400 | $796,800 | 10.3% | |
79 | Private | $191,800 | $792,300 | 10.1% | |
80 | Public (In-State) | $96,930 | $791,100 | 12.3% | |
81 | Public (In-State) | $117,400 | $783,900 | 11.6% | |
82 | Private | $185,100 | $781,800 | 10.2% | |
83 | Public (Out-of-State) | $135,500 | $779,300 | 11.2% | |
84 | Private | $201,300 | $779,200 | 10% | |
85 | Private | $163,000 | $771,500 | 10.6% | |
86 | Public (In-State) | $101,400 | $770,000 | 12.1% | |
87 | Public (In-State) | $108,200 | $769,300 | 11.8% | |
88 | Public (In-State) | $117,000 | $767,900 | 11.6% | |
89 | Public (Out-of-State) | $154,300 | $763,500 | 10.7% | |
90 | Public (Out-of-State) | $136,800 | $761,200 | 11.1% | |
91 | Public (In-State) | $121,700 | $760,500 | 11.4% | |
92 | Private | $186,300 | $758,800 | 10.1% | |
93 | Private | $204,000 | $758,400 | 9.8% | |
94 | Private | $188,800 | $757,000 | 10.1% | |
95 | Private | $185,900 | $748,100 | 10.1% | |
96 | Private | $226,600 | $748,000 | 9.5% | |
97 | Public (Out-of-State) | $207,500 | $738,500 | 9.7% | |
98 | Public (Out-of-State) | $149,400 | $738,000 | 10.7% | |
99 | Private | $168,900 | $735,000 | 10.3% | |
100 | Private | $195,600 | $733,800 | 9.9% | |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)